DH5α Cells Explained: Genotype, Mutations, Blue-White Screening, Competent Cell Preparation & Cloning Applications

Table of Contents

• Introduction to DH5-Alpha (DH5α) Cells
• Genotype of DH5 alpha
• Understanding the key mutations
• Role of the endA1Mutation: Ensuring High-Quality Plasmid Isolation
• recA1 Deficiency: Preventing Homologous Recombination and DNA Instability
• Blue White Screening: The Importance of the lacZΔM15 marker
• The Mechanism of Blue-White Screening
• Why DH5α is the Gold Standard for Cloning?
• Common Applications
• DH5α vs. BL21 Cells
• When to use cloning vs expression strains?
• Preparation of Competent Cells: Chemical vs. Electroporation Methods 
• Chemical
• Physical
• Chemical vs. Electroporation
• Troubleshooting: Common Challenges with DH5-Alpha Growth and Transformation
• Conclusion
• References

Introduction to DH5-Alpha (DH5α) Cells

• DH5α is a genetically engineered strain of Escherichia coli belonging to the K-12 lineage, and it is widely used in molecular biology laboratories for the amplification of exogenous plasmid DNA during cloning and transformation experiments.
• The DH5α strain was originally constructed by Douglas Hanahan from the parental strain DH1, specifically to improve plasmid transformation efficiency and DNA propagation in cloning workflows.
• The foundational documentation describing the use of DH5α in plasmid transformation experiments was published by Hanahan and colleagues in 1991, which helped establish it as one of the most commonly used cloning strains in molecular biology research.
• The complete genome size of DH5α is approximately 4,630,707 base pairs, and the strain contains specific structural genomic variations that account for approximately 96 kilobases (kb) difference compared with its parental strain DH1, reflecting genetic modifications introduced during its development.

Genotype of DH5 alpha

The genotype of DH5α, a commonly used cloning strain of Escherichia coli with each genetic element contributes to its suitability for molecular cloning and plasmid propagation.

• F⁻ indicates that the strain lacks the fertility (F) plasmid, meaning it cannot form sex pili for bacterial conjugation, which helps maintain plasmid stability during cloning.
• ϕ80dlacZΔM15 refers to a defective prophage carrying a deletion in the lacZ gene, allowing α-complementation of β-galactosidase, which is the basis for blue-white screening used in recombinant plasmid identification.
• Δ(argF–lac)169 represents a large chromosomal deletion spanning from the argF gene to the lac operon, which contributes to the lacZ mutation used in cloning selection.
• U169 is a specific mutation within the lac region associated with the deletion that supports the α-complementation system used for screening recombinant clones.
• deoR is a mutation in the deoxyribose operon repressor gene, affecting regulation of nucleoside metabolism.
• recA1 indicates a mutation in the recA gene, which reduces homologous recombination activity and prevents unwanted recombination of cloned DNA sequences, increasing plasmid stability.
• endA1 is a mutation in the endonuclease I gene, which reduces nonspecific endonuclease activity, leading to higher quality plasmid DNA preparations.
• hsdR17 (rK⁻ mK⁺) refers to a mutation in the host restriction system, where the strain lacks restriction activity (rK⁻) but retains methylation ability (mK⁺), allowing foreign DNA to be maintained without degradation.
• phoA is a mutation affecting alkaline phosphatase activity, often used as a genetic marker.
• supE44 is an amber suppressor tRNA mutation, enabling suppression of certain nonsense mutations during protein translation.
• λ⁻ indicates the absence of lambda prophage, which improves genetic stability in cloning experiments.
• thi-1 represents a mutation requiring thiamine supplementation for optimal growth.
• gyrA96 is a mutation in the DNA gyrase gene, which can influence DNA supercoiling and antibiotic sensitivity.
• relA1 is a mutation in the relA gene, affecting the stringent response and regulation of RNA synthesis under nutrient limitation.

Understanding the key mutations

DH5α, a cloning strain of Escherichia coli, contains several well-known genetic mutations that make it an ideal host for recombinant DNA experiments, particularly for plasmid cloning, transformation, and stable propagation of foreign DNA.

• recA1 – This mutation inactivates the RecA protein, which normally mediates homologous recombination in bacteria. The loss of RecA activity significantly reduces recombination between similar DNA sequences, thereby ensuring that foreign plasmids remain stable without rearrangement, recombination, or degradation during replication in the host cell.
• endA1 – This mutation inactivates a non-specific endonuclease (Endonuclease I) present in wild-type strains. In normal cells, this enzyme can degrade plasmid DNA during the isolation process, which results in poor DNA quality. The endA1 mutation prevents this degradation, leading to significantly higher quality plasmid DNA preparations (minipreps) commonly used in molecular biology workflows.
• gyrA96 – This mutation occurs in the DNA gyrase A subunit, an enzyme responsible for introducing negative supercoils and relieving torsional stress in bacterial DNA during processes such as DNA replication, transcription, and recombination. The gyrA96 mutation confers resistance to the antibiotic nalidixic acid, a drug that normally inhibits DNA gyrase. Because of this resistance, nalidixic acid can act as a selectable marker, allowing only bacteria carrying the mutation to survive and grow in its presence.
• hsdR17 (rK⁻, mK⁺) – This mutation affects the restriction–modification system of E. coli. With this alteration, the cells lose restriction activity (restriction negative, rK⁻) and therefore do not digest incoming foreign DNA, such as recombinant plasmids introduced during transformation. However, they retain methylation capability (modification positive, mK⁺), which allows the bacterium to methylate and protect its own DNA from accidental degradation.
• Δ(argF–lac)169 – This mutation represents a large chromosomal deletion of approximately 85,086 base pairs, extending from mmuP to cynS. The removal of this genomic region simplifies the bacterial genome, which contributes to more stable and efficient cloning performance in laboratory applications.
• ϕ80dlacZΔM15 – This element consists of phage-derived DNA carrying a modified lacZ gene. In this modification, the lacZ gene is 94 base pairs shorter at the N-terminus compared with the parental strain, allowing α-complementation of β-galactosidase. This property enables blue–white screening, a widely used technique for easily identifying bacteria that carry recombinant plasmids.
• phoQ – This mutation involves an amino acid substitution (Valine 306 → Isoleucine) in the PhoQ sensor kinase protein, which is part of a two-component regulatory system. This change increases tolerance to multivalent cations, such as Mn²⁺ and Ca²⁺, commonly present in bacterial transformation buffers, thereby improving transformation efficiency.

Table 1: Key mutations in DH5α and their roles in cloning

S.N.	Key Mutation	Gene / System Affected	Functional Effect	Advantage in Cloning
1	recA1	recA (recombination protein)	Inactivates RecA, disabling homologous recombination	Prevents plasmid rearrangements and ensures genetic stability of cloned DNA
2	endA1	endA1 (Endonuclease I)	Inactivates a non-specific endonuclease	Yields high-quality plasmid DNA suitable for sequencing and restriction analysis
3	gyrA96	DNA gyrase	Alters DNA supercoiling	Enhances plasmid stability and provides nalidixic acid resistance, allowing selection of mutant cells
4	hsdR17 (rK⁻, mK⁺)	Restriction–Modification system	Prevents restriction digestion of foreign DNA while retaining methylation of host DNA	Protects plasmid DNA from degradation during transformation
5	Δ(argF–lac)169	lac operon (lacZYA region)	Large 85,086 bp deletion from mmuP to cynS	Simplifies the genome, facilitating stable and efficient cloning
6	ϕ80dlacZΔM15	lacZ (β-galactosidase α-fragment)	N-terminal deletion enabling α-complementation	Enables blue–white screening to easily identify bacteria containing recombinant plasmids
7	phoQ	phoQ sensor protein	Amino acid substitution Val306 → Ile	Increases tolerance to multivalent cations (Mn²⁺, Ca²⁺) in transformation buffers, improving transformation efficiency

Role of the endA1Mutation: Ensuring High-Quality Plasmid Isolation

• The endA gene in Escherichia coli encodes Endonuclease I, a highly abundant, non-sequence-specific enzyme responsible for introducing double-strand breaks in duplex DNA and contributing to DNA turnover and genomic integrity under normal cellular conditions.
• During plasmid isolation, Endonuclease I can degrade both chromosomal and plasmid DNA when cells are lysed.
• In endA⁺ (wild-type) strains, the nuclease activity often causes loss of supercoiled plasmid form, resulting in degraded smears on agarose gels and reduced DNA quality.
• The endA1 mutation, present in cloning strains like DH5α, significantly reduces Endonuclease I activity, preventing the degradation of plasmid DNA during isolation.
• The endA1 mutation maintains the stability of the supercoiled plasmid conformation, ensuring that plasmids remain intact during extraction procedures.
• This mutation leads to improved purity and integrity of isolated plasmid DNA, making it suitable for downstream applications such as sequencing, restriction digestion, and cloning experiments.
• Overall, the endA1 mutation plays a critical role in minimizing plasmid degradation during cloning, supporting high-quality plasmid recovery and reliable molecular biology workflows.

recA1 Deficiency: Preventing Homologous Recombination and DNA Instability

• The recA1 mutation is a genetic alteration commonly introduced in Escherichia coli cloning strains to enhance DNA stability by inactivating the primary homologous recombination pathway.
• The recA1 allele contains a point mutation (Gly160 → Asp, G160D), producing a defective RecA protein that can bind single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) but cannot perform ATP-dependent strand exchange, which is essential for homologous recombination.
• This mutation blocks the pairing and strand exchange between homologous sequences, preventing the formation of heteroduplex DNA.
• In cloning strains like DH5α, the recA1 mutation prevents homologous recombination, which results in:
• Prevention of plasmid multimerization: Stops intermolecular recombination between plasmids that can form dimers or multimers, which are unstable and prone to loss during cell division, especially in high-copy plasmids.
• Prevention of intramolecular recombination: Avoids homologous recombination within a single plasmid, thereby preventing deletions of specific DNA sequences.
• Prevention of plasmid–chromosome integration: Reduces the risk of recombination between the cloned plasmid DNA and the host chromosome, ensuring stable maintenance of the plasmid.
• Overall, the recA1 deficiency plays a crucial role in maintaining plasmid integrity and preventing DNA instability during cloning and propagation in E. coli.

Blue White Screening: The Importance of the lacZΔM15 marker

• Blue–white screening is a molecular biology technique used to differentiate bacterial colonies that have successfully taken up a recombinant plasmid from those that have not, relying on α-complementation of the lacZΔM15 gene.
• The lacZΔM15 marker is a specific deletion mutation in the lacZ gene of DH5α, which normally encodes β-galactosidase, an enzyme that allows bacteria to metabolize lactose as an energy source when glucose is absent.
• The lacZΔM15 mutation involves a small deletion in the N-terminal region of lacZ, specifically removing amino acid residues 11–41 or 23–31, depending on the variant.
• β-galactosidase is normally a tetramer, requiring four identical subunits to assemble properly to become enzymatically active.
• The M15 deletion removes amino acids critical for stabilizing the interface between subunits, preventing the tetramer from forming.
• As a result, the mutant protein, also called the α-acceptor or ω-fragment, can only form inactive dimers, rendering it enzymatically inactive unless complemented by a plasmid carrying the missing α-fragment.
• This system allows recombinant plasmids containing the α-fragment of lacZ to restore enzymatic activity, forming blue colonies on X-gal plates, while colonies without the plasmid remain white, enabling easy identification of successful transformants.

The Mechanism of Blue-White Screening

• Blue–white screening relies on the requirement of the missing N-terminal amino acid residues to restore β-galactosidase enzymatic activity.
• The host E. coli strain (e.g., DH5α or DH10B) carries the lacZΔM15 mutation on its chromosome, producing an inactive α-acceptor fragment (M15 dimers).
• The cloning vector (plasmid) carries the DNA sequence encoding the missing N-terminal fragment, known as the α-peptide or α-donor.
• When the plasmid enters the host cell, the α-peptide interacts with the M15 α-acceptor, providing the structural elements necessary to assemble functional β-galactosidase tetramers.
• If the plasmid produces a functional α-peptide, the resulting active β-galactosidase hydrolyzes the chromogenic substrate X-gal, producing the intensely blue product 5,5′-dibromo-4,4′-dichloro-indigo, which stains the colony blue.
• If foreign DNA is successfully inserted into the plasmid’s Multiple Cloning Site (MCS), which is located within the α-peptide coding sequence, the insertion disrupts the reading frame.
• This disruption prevents production of active β-galactosidase, so α-complementation fails, and the colonies remain white, allowing easy identification of recombinant clones.

Why DH5α is the Gold Standard for Cloning?

• DH5α is considered the gold standard for cloning due to its exceptionally high transformation efficiency, which is the number of colony-forming units (CFU) produced per microgram (μg) of plasmid DNA.
• Escherichia coli DH5α is genetically optimized for recombinant DNA work, allowing highly competent cells to routinely achieve transformation efficiencies of ~10⁹ CFU/μg of plasmid DNA.
• Key genetic features contributing to its high transformation efficiency include:
• recA1 – Inactivates the RecA protein, reducing homologous recombination and ensuring foreign plasmids remain stable without rearrangement or degradation.
• endA1 – Inactivates the non-specific endonuclease I, which prevents degradation of plasmid DNA during isolation, resulting in higher quality plasmid minipreps.
• hsdR17 (rK⁻, mK⁺) – Alters the restriction–modification system so the cells do not digest foreign DNA (restriction negative, rK⁻) while still methylating their own DNA (modification positive, mK⁺), protecting it from accidental degradation.
• ϕ80dlacZΔM15 – Contains phage-derived DNA with a modified lacZ gene that is 94 bases shorter at the N-terminus than the parental strain. This enables α-complementation, allowing blue–white screening to easily identify bacteria that have taken up recombinant plasmids.
• These combined features make DH5α highly reliable for cloning, plasmid propagation, and genetic manipulations, establishing it as the preferred strain for molecular biology applications.

Common Applications

• DH5α is widely used to clone DNA fragments of interest into plasmids, amplify the plasmid DNA, and subsequently transfer it into expression strains (e.g., BL21) for protein production.
• It is commonly employed for blue–white screening, enabling visual identification of recombinant clones based on α-complementation of lacZΔM15.
• DH5α is also used to generate large plasmid libraries, including genomic libraries, cDNA libraries, and mutagenesis libraries, supporting high-throughput cloning and functional studies.

DH5α vs. BL21 Cells

Property	DH5α	BL21
Type	Cloning strain	Expression strain
Strain origin	K-12 lineage of Escherichia coli	B lineage of Escherichia coli
Primary use	Cloning and plasmid maintenance	Expression of recombinant proteins
Key mutations	recA1, endA1, hsdR17 (rK⁻, mK⁺)	Deficient in Lon and OmpT proteases (prevents degradation of expressed proteins); often contains T7 RNA polymerase gene (as in BL21(DE3)) for strong, inducible gene expression
recA1	Non-functional (reduces homologous recombination)	Functional (normal recombination occurs)
endA1	Non-functional (reduces endonuclease activity, ideal for high-quality plasmid prep)	Active endonuclease (not ideal for plasmid isolation)
Blue–white screening	Yes (ϕ80dlacZΔM15)	No
Typical uses	Routine subcloning, plasmid amplification, site-directed mutagenesis, plasmid library construction	Recombinant protein production, enzyme purification

When to use cloning vs expression strains?

• The choice between cloning strains and expression strains depends on the experimental goal:
• Use cloning strains (e.g., DH5α) when the primary objective is stable maintenance, amplification, and manipulation of plasmid DNA, such as subcloning, site-directed mutagenesis, or library construction.
• Use expression strains (e.g., BL21) when the goal is high-level production of recombinant proteins, including enzyme expression, protein purification, or functional assays.
• In short, cloning strains for DNA work, expression strains for protein work.

Preparation of Competent Cells: Chemical vs. Electroporation Methods 

• Competent cells are bacterial cells that have the ability to take up exogenous DNA from their environment.
• The preparation of competent cells and their transformation is a key molecular biology technique used to introduce a target DNA fragment or plasmid into a host cell (e.g., DH5α) and produce multiple copies of it.
• The two most commonly used transformation approaches are chemical (chemical competence) and physical (electroporation) methods.
• Both methods work by temporarily permeabilizing the bacterial cell membrane, allowing the exogenous DNA to enter the cell for replication and expression.

Chemical

• The chemical method of transformation is widely used in molecular cloning because it is simple, convenient, and inexpensive.
• The classical chemical transformation method was first described by Mandel and Higa (1970) and remains a major technique in most laboratories, yielding transformation efficiencies of ~10⁵ to 10⁷ CFU/µg of plasmid DNA.

Classic chemical transformation generally involves three main steps:

1. Induction of competence – Treat recipient cells with calcium chloride (CaCl₂) to make the cell membrane more receptive to DNA.
2. DNA uptake – Mix competent cells with plasmid DNA and apply heat shock, usually at 42°C, to promote DNA entry.
3. Selection – Plate transformed cells on selective media to isolate successfully transformed colonies.

Mechanism:

• Both DNA and the bacterial cell membrane (especially lipopolysaccharides in Gram-negative bacteria) are negatively charged, causing electrostatic repulsion.
• Divalent cations (Ca²⁺) bind to the negative phosphate, hydroxyl, and carboxyl groups on the membrane, neutralizing charges and forming a chemical bridge between the DNA and the cell surface.
• At low temperatures, these cations also reduce membrane fluidity and form complexes with poly-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) and poly-inorganic phosphate (poly-P), creating small transient pores through which DNA can pass.
• Osmotic pressure contributes to membrane permeability: the influx of chloride ions draws water into the cell, causing temporary swelling and facilitating DNA entry.
• A rapid temperature shift from cold to hot (heat shock at 42°C) induces transient opening of membrane channels, allowing exogenous DNA to enter the cytoplasm.

Physical

• Electroporation, also called electro-transformation, is the most common physical method of bacterial transformation.
• This method uses high-intensity electric fields to introduce exogenous DNA into the recipient cell.
• Electroporation achieves exceptionally high transformation efficiencies, typically 10⁹ to 10¹⁰ transformants per µg of DNA.
• It requires very high cell densities, usually in the range of 2 × 10⁸ to 4 × 10¹⁰ cells/mL, for optimal efficiency.

Mechanism:

• The strong electric field transiently permeabilizes the cell membrane, forming temporary pores.
• The exogenous DNA is driven through these pores into the cytoplasm by electrophoretic forces, enabling efficient uptake and subsequent replication.
• Electroporation is preferred when very high transformation efficiency is required, such as for large plasmids, library construction, or difficult-to-transform strains.

Chemical vs. Electroporation

Property	Chemical Transformation	Physical Method (Electroporation)
Mechanism	Uses divalent cations (Ca²⁺) to neutralize membrane charges and heat shock to open gated channels for DNA uptake	Applies high-intensity electric fields to transiently permeabilize the cell membrane, allowing DNA to enter via electrophoretic force
Transformation efficiency	~10⁵ to 10⁷ CFU/µg of plasmid DNA	~10⁹ to 10¹⁰ CFU/µg of plasmid DNA
Requirements	Simple lab equipment: ice bath, water bath	Requires an electroporator and specialized cuvettes
Best suited for	Routine cloning and small plasmid vectors	High-complexity libraries and large DNA fragments (e.g., BACs)
Salt tolerance	High: salts in DNA prep are generally tolerated	Very low: salts can cause arcing, killing the cells
Cost	Inexpensive	Expensive

Troubleshooting: Common Challenges with DH5-Alpha Growth and Transformation

Low transformation efficiency:

• Competent cells with low efficiency may produce few or no colonies.
• To check, calculate transformation efficiency using an uncut plasmid of known concentration (e.g., pUC19).
• If efficiency is <10⁴ CFU/µg DNA, remake competent cells or use commercial high-efficiency competent cells.

Electrical sparking during electroporation:

• Caused by high salt contamination from DNA prep or growth media.
• Solution: wash cells extensively with 10% glycerol or sterile water to remove salts before electroporation.

Plasmid DNA concentration:

• High DNA concentration can be toxic, reducing transformation efficiency.
• Optimal plasmid amount for DH5α is typically 5–10 ng per transformation.

Plasmid size effect:

• Smaller plasmids transform more efficiently than larger ones.
• For large plasmids, use highly competent cells and consider electroporation for higher efficiency.

Cell stress from transformation:

• Heat shock or electric pulse creates temporary pores in the membrane, stressing the cells.
• Recovery in nutrient-rich medium (e.g., SOC medium) promotes faster cell repair, plasmid establishment, and antibiotic resistance gene expression.
• SOC is preferred over LB because it contains richer nutrients, magnesium ions, and glucose, leading to higher transformation efficiency.

Temperature considerations:

• Precise adherence to the heat-shock protocol is critical for chemically competent cells.
• After transformation, incubate cells at 37°C in a shaking incubator to evenly distribute nutrients and allow recovery of the antibiotic resistance gene.

Antibiotic selection issues:

• Incorrect antibiotic: no colonies will form.
• Too low concentration: satellite colonies may appear, forming a uniform lawn of non-transformed cells.
• Always verify the selectable marker on the plasmid and use the appropriate antibiotic concentration for selection.
• This comprehensive troubleshooting ensures higher success rates when working with DH5α for cloning and plasmid transformation.

Conclusion

• DH5α remains a fundamental tool in molecular biology because of its carefully engineered genetic modifications, including recA1, endA1, hsdR17 (rK⁻, mK⁺), and ϕ80dlacZΔM15, which collectively provide high transformation efficiency and strong plasmid stability for routine cloning work.
• These mutations allow researchers to amplify plasmid DNA with minimal degradation and reduced unwanted recombination, ensuring reliable maintenance of recombinant DNA in the host strain Escherichia coli.
• The ϕ80dlacZΔM15 marker also enables blue–white screening, allowing rapid visual identification of recombinant clones during cloning experiments.
• Although DH5α cells are not suitable for recombinant protein expression, they serve as an ideal host for constructing and maintaining recombinant plasmids, which can later be transferred into protein expression strains such as BL21.
• Due to these advantages, DH5α has become the gold standard for plasmid propagation and routine cloning, forming a core component of modern molecular cloning strategies used in research laboratories.

References

• Alves, L. D. F., Borelli, T. C., Westmann, C. A., & Silva-Rocha, R. (2020). Boundaries in metagenomic screenings using lacZα-based vectors. 20180252, 1–9.
• Borja, G. M., Mora, E. M., Barrón, B., Gosset, G., Ramírez, O. T., & Lara, A. R. (2012). Engineering Escherichia coli to increase plasmid DNA production in high cell-density batch cultivations. 40, 1–9.
• Cha, D. O., & Rubens, C. E. (1998). Blue–white screening of recombinant plasmids in Gram-positive bacteria by interruption of alkaline phosphatase gene (phoZ) expression. 219, 91–99.
• Chen, X., Guo, P., Xie, Z., & Shen, P. (2001). A convenient and rapid method for genetic transformation of E. coli with plasmids. 297–300.
• Fathi-Roudsari, M., Akhavian-Tehrani, A., & Maghsoudi, N. (2016). Comparison of three Escherichia coli strains in recombinant production of reteplase. 8(1), 16–22.
• Gonzales, M. F., Brooks, T., Pukatzki, S. U., & Provenzano, D. (2013). Rapid protocol for preparation of electrocompetent Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae. October, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.3791/50684
• Griffith, M., & Gietz, R. D. (2018). Escherichia coli endA deletion strain for use in two-hybrid shuttle vector selection. 6205. https://doi.org/10.2144/03352bm05
• Group, M. B., & Medical, S. (1988). Nucleic Acids Research, 5(13), 6127–6145.
• Itaya, M., Kawata, Y., Sato, M., Tomita, M., & Nakahigashi, K. (2012). A simple method to provide a shuttling plasmid for delivery to other hosts based on prolonged stability of extracellular plasmid DNA. 152(6), 501–504. https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvs111
• Juers, D. H., Matthews, B. W., & Huber, R. E. (2012). LacZ β-galactosidase: Structure and function of an enzyme of historical and molecular biological importance. 21. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.2165
• Kostylev, M., Otwell, A. E., Richardson, R. E., & Suzuki, Y. (2015). Cloning should be simple: Escherichia coli DH5α-mediated assembly of multiple DNA fragments with short end homologies. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137466
• Liu, Z., Tyo, K. E. J., Martínez, J. L., Petranovic, D., & Nielsen, J. (2012). Different expression systems for recombinant protein production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 109(5), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24409
• Monk, J. M., Koza, A., Campodonico, M., Machado, D., Herrgård, M. J., Palsson, B. O., & Feist, A. M. (2017). Multi-omics analysis of Escherichia coli. Cell Systems, 3(3), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2016.08.013
• Nakata, Y., Tang, X., & Yokoyama, K. K. Preparation of competent cells for high-efficiency transformation.
• Nishimura, A., Moritai, M., Nishimura, Y., & Sugino, Y. (1990). A rapid and highly efficient method for preparation of competent Escherichia coli cells. 18(20), 6169.
• Nováková, J., Izsáková, A., & Grivalský, T. (2013). Improved method for high-efficiency electrotransformation of Escherichia coli with large BAC plasmids. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-013-0267-1
• Phue, J., Lee, S. J., Trinh, L., & Shiloach, J. (2008). Modified Escherichia coli B (BL21), a superior producer of plasmid DNA compared with E. coli K-12 (DH5α). Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 101(4), 831–836. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21973
• Plant, T. E., Inoue, H., Nojima, H., & Okayama, H. (1990). High-efficiency transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids: Optimization of transformation buffer. 96, 23–28.
• Reddy, M. (2018). Positive selection system for identification of recombinants using α-complementation plasmids. https://doi.org/10.2144/04376ST03
• Sadeghi, S., Ahmadi, N., & Esmaeili, A. (2017). Blue-white screening as a new readout for deoxyribozyme activity in bacterial cells. RSC Advances, 7, 54835–54843. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA09679H
• Schweizer, H. P. (2018). Bacterial genetics: Past achievements, present state, and future challenges. https://doi.org/10.2144/000112807
• Sharma, A., Girdhar, A., & Srivastava, N. (2011). Development of strategies for competent cell preparation and high-efficiency plasmid transformation using different methods. 17–20.
• Shuman, H. A., & Silhavy, T. J. (2003). The art and design of genetic screens: Escherichia coli. 4(June).
• Tang, X., Nakata, Y., Li, H., Zhang, M., Gao, H., & Fujita, A. (1994). Optimization of competent cell preparation for transformation of E. coli. 22(14), 2857–2858.
• Tu, Q., Yin, J., Fu, J., Herrmann, J., Li, Y., & Yin, Y. (2016). Room-temperature electrocompetent bacterial cells improve DNA transformation and recombineering efficiency. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24648
• Wang, Y., Wang, X., Yu, L., Tian, Y., Li, S., Leng, F., Ma, J., & Chen, J. (2020). Effects of Sr²⁺ on preparation of Escherichia coli DH5α competent cells and plasmid transformation. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9480
• Zamenhof, P. J., & Villarejo, M. (1972). Construction and properties of Escherichia coli strains exhibiting α-complementation of β-galactosidase fragments in vivo. 110(1), 171–178.