Table of Content
- Introduction
- Regulatory T Cells and the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
- Superconducting Quantum Circuits and the Nobel Prize in Physics
- Artificial Intelligence and Neural Networks in Scientific Research
- MicroRNA: Small RNA Molecules With Major Biological Functions
- Quantum Information Science and Bell Inequality Tests
- Other Nobel-Recognized Discoveries With Lasting Biomedical Impact
- Comparison of Major Nobel-Related Research Themes
- Emerging Research Areas and Potential Future Nobel Recognition
- Why Do Nobel-Worthy Discoveries Often Take Decades to Be Recognized?
- Research Gaps and Future Scientific Questions
- Conclusion
- Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
- References
Introduction
- Scientific discoveries often take decades to move from initial observations to established mechanisms, practical applications, and international recognition. Nobel Prize-winning research illustrates this process, demonstrating how fundamental investigations can eventually transform medicine, physics, biotechnology, and modern computing.
- Recent Nobel-related scientific literature highlights several important research areas, including regulatory T cells (Tregs), peripheral immune tolerance, superconducting quantum circuits, artificial intelligence, quantum information science, and microRNA biology. These fields illustrate how discoveries in fundamental science can contribute to new therapeutic approaches and technological platforms.
- A literature review published in 2026 examined research and commentary on recent Nobel-recognized discoveries, their scientific significance, their subsequent applications, and fields discussed as potential candidates for future recognition. The review particularly emphasized the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, associated with regulatory T cells and immune tolerance, and the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics, associated with macroscopic quantum phenomena in electrical circuits (Huang et al., 2026; Cleland & Girvin, 2026).
- Important clarification: The supplied literature review does not establish the official winners of the 2026 Nobel Prizes. Its findings should therefore be understood as a review of recent Nobel-related research trajectories rather than an authoritative announcement of the 2026 laureates.
1. Regulatory T Cells and the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
What are regulatory T cells?
- Regulatory T cells, commonly abbreviated as Tregs, are a specialized population of immune cells that help control immune responses and maintain immunological tolerance.
- The immune system must recognize and respond to pathogens while avoiding excessive inflammation and attacks against the body's own tissues. Regulatory T cells contribute to this balance by suppressing inappropriate immune activation and helping maintain immune homeostasis.
- A major advance in this field was the identification of CD4+CD25+ suppressive T cells and the subsequent establishment of FOXP3 as a central regulator of regulatory T-cell development and function. Research involving these cells helped explain important mechanisms underlying peripheral immune tolerance (Huang et al., 2026; Bluestone, 2025).
The role of FOXP3 in immune regulation
FOXP3 is a transcription factor that plays a critical role in the development and function of regulatory T cells.
Research involving mutations in the FOXP3 gene connected defects in immune regulation with the scurfy phenotype in mice and immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome (IPEX) in humans. These findings strengthened the molecular understanding of regulatory T-cell biology.
The research trajectory described in the literature can be summarized as follows:
Identification of suppressive immune cells: Researchers identified T-cell populations capable of limiting immune responses.
Genetic evidence: Studies connected FOXP3 mutations with severe immune dysregulation.
Molecular characterization: FOXP3 became established as a key regulator of the regulatory T-cell lineage.
Therapeutic exploration: Researchers began investigating ways to manipulate regulatory T cells to treat immune-mediated diseases and other conditions.
This progression illustrates how cellular observations can develop into a mechanistic understanding of immune regulation and eventually support therapeutic research (Huang et al., 2026; Jiang et al., 2025).
Clinical significance of regulatory T-cell research
Regulatory T-cell biology has implications for several medical fields.
Autoimmune diseases: Enhancing appropriate immune regulation may help control immune responses directed against the body's own tissues.
Organ transplantation: Regulatory T cells are being investigated for their potential to promote donor-specific immune tolerance.
Cancer immunology: Tregs can suppress antitumor immune responses, making their activity an important consideration in cancer treatment.
Tissue repair: Regulatory immune mechanisms are being studied for their roles in controlling inflammation and supporting tissue homeostasis.
Transplant-related complications: Treg-based approaches are being investigated for conditions involving harmful immune responses after transplantation.
These applications do not mean that regulatory T-cell therapies are established treatments for every condition listed. Clinical effectiveness, safety, cell stability, and appropriate targeting remain important research questions (Perkins & Naesens, 2026; Zuber & Kaminski, 2025).
Emerging Treg-based therapeutic approaches
Several therapeutic strategies are being investigated to modify regulatory T-cell activity.
- Low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2): IL-2 supports T-cell biology. Carefully selected low-dose regimens are being investigated for their ability to preferentially support regulatory T cells in particular clinical settings.
- IL-2 variants and muteins: Engineered forms of IL-2 are being explored to modify receptor interactions and improve the selective stimulation of desired immune-cell populations.
- Ex vivo Treg expansion: Regulatory T cells can be isolated and expanded outside the body before being investigated for therapeutic administration.
- Donor-specific regulatory T cells: These approaches aim to direct immune regulation toward particular donor antigens, potentially improving tolerance in transplantation.
- Chimeric antigen receptor regulatory T cells (CAR-Tregs): These engineered cells are designed to recognize selected targets and deliver localized immunoregulatory activity.
Although these approaches have considerable research potential, challenges include maintaining stable regulatory function, achieving appropriate target specificity, minimizing unwanted immunosuppression, and demonstrating durable clinical benefits (Zuber & Kaminski, 2025; Wan, 2025).
2. Superconducting Quantum Circuits and the Nobel Prize in Physics
What are superconducting quantum circuits?
- Superconducting quantum circuits are electrical circuits constructed using superconducting materials and designed to exhibit quantum-mechanical behavior.
- Unlike conventional electronic circuits, these systems can demonstrate quantum phenomena that are important for developing and controlling quantum information-processing devices.
- The physics literature reviewed in the supplied report focuses on macroscopic quantum tunneling and energy quantization in superconducting circuits. These advances helped establish that quantum effects can be observed and studied in engineered electrical systems, providing a foundation for subsequent developments in quantum computing hardware (Cleland & Girvin, 2026; Guo & Wang, 2025).
Macroscopic quantum tunneling
- Quantum tunneling occurs when a quantum system has a nonzero probability of crossing an energy barrier even when a corresponding classical system would not have sufficient energy to cross it.
- In superconducting circuits, researchers can engineer and investigate quantum states involving collective electrical variables. Experiments on these systems helped establish the macroscopic observation of quantum phenomena in carefully designed circuits.
Energy quantization in electrical circuits
- In classical physics, energy is often treated as varying continuously. Quantum systems, however, can possess discrete allowed energy levels.
- Demonstrating energy quantization in superconducting circuits provided important evidence that engineered electrical systems can behave as controllable quantum systems.
- These findings helped establish superconducting circuits as a major platform for experimental quantum physics and quantum computing research.
Applications of superconducting quantum circuits
The scientific importance of this research extends beyond fundamental physics.
Quantum computing: Superconducting circuits can serve as qubits, the basic units of quantum information processing.
Quantum control: Researchers can manipulate and measure engineered quantum states.
Quantum information science: These systems support investigations into the storage, processing, and measurement of quantum information.
Fundamental physics: Superconducting circuits provide controlled environments for studying quantum behavior in engineered systems.
Nevertheless, the development of practical quantum computers remains challenging. Noise, decoherence, control errors, scaling limitations, and the difficulty of maintaining reliable quantum operations continue to require substantial research.
3. Artificial Intelligence and Neural Networks in Scientific Research
- Artificial intelligence has become increasingly important in scientific discovery, data analysis, pattern recognition, and computational modeling.
- The supplied literature discusses the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics in connection with John Hopfield and Geoffrey Hinton, whose foundational work on neural networks helped establish concepts underlying modern machine learning.
Neural networks and scientific computation
Artificial neural networks are computational systems inspired in part by the organization of biological neural networks. They learn patterns from data by adjusting parameters during training.
Their scientific applications include:
Identifying complex patterns in large datasets.
Supporting image and signal analysis.
Developing predictive models.
Assisting computational modeling in physics and other sciences.
Exploring relationships that may be difficult to identify through conventional analytical approaches.
AI is increasingly integrated into physics, optics, photonics, and other computationally intensive disciplines (McClelland, 2025; Ozcan, 2024).
Limitations of AI in scientific discovery
Despite its potential, artificial intelligence does not automatically produce reliable scientific explanations.
Important limitations include:
Interpretability: Some models provide limited insight into why a particular prediction was generated.
Data quality: Biased, incomplete, or inaccurate datasets can produce misleading results.
Validation: Predictions must be evaluated against appropriate experimental or observational evidence.
Hallucinations: Generative AI systems can produce plausible-sounding but incorrect information.
AI is most valuable in scientific research when its outputs are independently evaluated and integrated with established experimental, theoretical, and statistical methods.
4. MicroRNA: Small RNA Molecules With Major Biological Functions
- MicroRNAs, commonly abbreviated as miRNAs, are small non-coding RNA molecules involved in the regulation of gene expression.
- Rather than encoding proteins, microRNAs generally regulate gene expression by interacting with target messenger RNAs and influencing their stability or translation.
How microRNAs regulate gene expression
The basic mechanism involves several stages:
MicroRNA genes are transcribed to produce precursor RNA molecules.
These precursors undergo processing to generate mature microRNAs.
Mature microRNAs associate with Argonaute-containing RNA-induced silencing complexes.
The complexes recognize target messenger RNAs through sequence-dependent interactions.
Target messenger RNAs may undergo translational repression, destabilization, or degradation.
Through these mechanisms, microRNAs contribute to the regulation of development, cellular differentiation, metabolism, and disease-associated processes.
Medical and biological significance
MicroRNA research has influenced multiple areas of molecular biology and biomedical research.
Developmental biology: MicroRNAs help regulate gene-expression programs during development.
Cancer research: Altered microRNA expression can be associated with tumor development and progression.
Diagnostic research: MicroRNA profiles are being investigated as potential biomarkers for selected diseases.
Therapeutic development: Researchers are exploring strategies to inhibit disease-associated microRNAs or restore the activity of beneficial ones.
The literature reviewed in the supplied report identifies microRNA biology as an important field following the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, while also highlighting ongoing therapeutic research (Quévillon Huberdeau & Meister, 2024; Kamarei & Lemke, 2025).
However, microRNA-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications vary in maturity. Further validation is necessary before many proposed applications can be translated into routine clinical practice.
5. Quantum Information Science and Bell Inequality Tests
- Quantum information science examines how quantum-mechanical systems can encode, process, transmit, and measure information.
- The 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics recognized experimental work involving entangled photons, the establishment of violations of Bell inequalities, and pioneering quantum information science.
What are Bell inequalities?
- Bell inequalities are mathematical relationships that distinguish predictions of local hidden-variable theories from those of quantum mechanics under specified experimental assumptions.
- Experiments demonstrating violations of Bell inequalities provide evidence that quantum correlations cannot be explained by local hidden-variable models satisfying the relevant assumptions.
- These findings have contributed to the development of quantum information science, including research on quantum communication, quantum cryptography, and quantum technologies.
- The literature reviewed in the supplied report also emphasizes the historical gap between foundational experiments and later international recognition, illustrating how the importance of scientific discoveries may become clearer as new applications emerge (Brassard, 2023).
6. Other Nobel-Recognized Discoveries With Lasting Biomedical Impact
The literature review also discusses earlier Nobel-recognized discoveries that illustrate the relationship between basic science and practical applications.
Oxygen sensing and cellular adaptation
- Research recognized by the 2019 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine clarified how cells sense and adapt to oxygen availability.
- Oxygen sensing involves molecular mechanisms that regulate cellular responses to changes in oxygen levels. The hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) pathway and oxygen-dependent regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor stability are central to this process.
- This research has informed investigations into physiological adaptation, cancer biology, and therapeutic approaches involving oxygen-sensing pathways (Lee et al., 2020; Kurtz, 2019).
Hepatitis C virus discovery
- The discovery of hepatitis C virus transformed the understanding of a major cause of chronic liver disease.
- Identifying the virus enabled the development of diagnostic tests and targeted antiviral treatments. The subsequent development of direct-acting antiviral drugs has made curative treatment possible for most patients who receive appropriate therapy.
- This scientific trajectory demonstrates how pathogen discovery can lead to major advances in diagnosis, treatment, and public health (Ghany et al., 2021).
Modified RNA and mRNA vaccines
- The 2023 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine recognized discoveries concerning nucleoside base modifications that enabled the development of effective mRNA vaccines against COVID-19.
- These findings helped address important challenges in the use of RNA as a therapeutic platform. Modified mRNA technology contributed to vaccine development by improving the practical performance of RNA-based approaches.
- Lipid nanoparticles have also played a crucial role in delivering RNA into cells. Their importance illustrates how complementary advances in molecular biology and drug-delivery technology can work together to enable clinical applications (Krammer & Palese, 2024; Furukawa, 2024).
7. Comparison of Major Nobel-Related Research Themes
The following table summarizes the principal research areas discussed in the supplied literature review.
| Research area | Central discovery or concept | Scientific significance | Major applications or implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory T cells | FOXP3-associated immune regulation and peripheral tolerance | Improved understanding of immune homeostasis | Autoimmunity, transplantation, and engineered cell therapies |
| Superconducting quantum circuits | Macroscopic quantum tunneling and energy quantization | Demonstration of quantum behavior in engineered electrical systems | Quantum computing and quantum information processing |
| Neural networks | Foundational computational models for machine learning | Development of modern AI methods | Scientific computation, prediction, and pattern recognition |
| MicroRNA | Small RNA-mediated regulation of gene expression | Improved understanding of molecular regulation | Developmental biology, biomarkers, and therapeutic research |
| Quantum information science | Experimental tests of Bell inequalities and quantum entanglement | Advancement of fundamental quantum theory and information science | Quantum communication and quantum technologies |
| Oxygen sensing | Molecular mechanisms of cellular oxygen sensing | Understanding cellular adaptation to oxygen availability | Physiology, cancer research, and drug development |
| Hepatitis C virus | Identification of a major viral cause of liver disease | Established a basis for targeted diagnosis and treatment | Viral diagnostics and curative antiviral therapy |
| Modified mRNA | Nucleoside modifications that support effective mRNA applications | Advanced RNA-based therapeutic technology | mRNA vaccines and other RNA-based interventions |
Source: Synthesis of the Nobel-related literature cited throughout this article.
8. Emerging Research Areas and Potential Future Nobel Recognition
The supplied review identifies several fields that receive attention in discussions of future scientific recognition. These should be understood as areas of scientific interest rather than reliable predictions of future Nobel Prize winners.
Aging and longevity research
- Research using model organisms, including Caenorhabditis elegans, has contributed to the understanding of aging, lifespan regulation, and biological pathways associated with longevity.
- The literature identifies this research as a possible future Nobel trajectory, but such commentary is speculative rather than predictive evidence (Chung-Pei et al., 2025).
MicroRNA therapeutics
Although microRNA biology has already received major recognition, the development of reliable RNA-based diagnostic and therapeutic approaches remains an active research area.
Future advances may depend on improving target specificity, delivery, safety, and evidence of clinical benefit.
Engineered immune-cell therapies
Regulatory T-cell research continues to generate approaches for manipulating immune responses. A major challenge is determining whether these treatments can provide stable, durable, and sufficiently specific effects in different diseases.
Artificial intelligence and quantum technologies
- Artificial intelligence and quantum computing are expanding the capabilities available to researchers across multiple disciplines.
- However, the long-term scientific impact of these technologies depends on solving technical limitations, validating their outputs, and demonstrating advances that extend beyond computational performance alone.
RNA delivery technologies
Lipid nanoparticles and other delivery systems are essential components of many RNA-based therapeutic approaches. Continued progress in delivery efficiency, tissue targeting, stability, and safety may expand the range of practical RNA applications.
A key principle: Scientific importance does not guarantee Nobel recognition. Future awards cannot be predicted reliably from the prominence of a research field, publication volume, or early clinical promise alone.
9. Why Do Nobel-Worthy Discoveries Often Take Decades to Be Recognized?
One recurring theme in the literature is the long interval between foundational research and major international recognition.
Several factors help explain this pattern:
Initial uncertainty: Early observations may be controversial or difficult to reproduce.
Mechanistic development: Additional research may be required to establish how a discovery works.
Independent validation: Findings gain strength when supported by multiple studies and research groups.
Technological advances: New instruments, analytical methods, and experimental systems can reveal the broader significance of earlier discoveries.
Practical applications: Subsequent work may demonstrate how foundational discoveries can transform medicine or technology.
The development of regulatory T-cell biology illustrates this progression from disputed cellular concepts to molecular mechanisms and therapeutic exploration. Similarly, foundational work in quantum physics and neural networks preceded later technological developments and Nobel recognition (Huang et al., 2026; McClelland, 2025; Cleland & Girvin, 2026).
These examples show why scientific impact should be assessed through the quality, reproducibility, explanatory power, and lasting influence of research rather than through immediate recognition alone.
10. Research Gaps and Future Scientific Questions
The supplied literature review identifies several limitations in the available research corpus.
First, the corpus is dominated by retrospective reviews, commentaries, and profiles rather than official announcements or primary experimental papers directly establishing the 2026 Nobel Prize outcomes.
Second, the medical literature provides more detailed mechanistic and clinical discussion than the physics literature included in the review. This limits direct comparisons between the two fields.
Third, discussions of possible future Nobel candidates are primarily speculative. The reviewed papers do not establish a reliable method for predicting future awards.
These limitations lead to several important research questions:
Which scientific and translational milestones distinguish Nobel-recognized discoveries from other high-impact research?
Can regulatory T-cell therapies provide durable efficacy while maintaining safety and target specificity?
Which barriers must be overcome before microRNA-based therapies can achieve broader clinical application?
How can superconducting quantum circuits be scaled while reducing noise and errors?
What methods can improve the interpretability and reliability of AI systems used in scientific research?
Which advances in RNA delivery will most effectively expand the clinical applications of RNA-based medicines?
Addressing these questions requires continued experimental investigation, independent validation, and careful evaluation of clinical and technological outcomes.
Conclusion
- Recent Nobel-related research demonstrates how fundamental discoveries can reshape scientific understanding and enable new technologies. Regulatory T-cell biology has advanced knowledge of immune tolerance and inspired emerging therapeutic strategies. Superconducting quantum circuits have strengthened the experimental foundations of quantum computing, while neural networks and quantum information science continue to influence modern computational research.
- MicroRNA biology, oxygen sensing, hepatitis C virus discovery, and modified mRNA illustrate additional pathways through which basic research has produced important biomedical applications.
- The central lesson is that major scientific advances rarely occur in isolation. They develop through sustained investigation, mechanistic understanding, independent validation, and subsequent translation into practical applications.
- The supplied literature review supports an evidence-based discussion of these research trajectories, but it does not establish the official 2026 Nobel Prize winners. Any claims about the 2026 awards should therefore be verified separately against authoritative Nobel Prize announcements.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What does the supplied literature review say about the 2026 Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physics?
It does not identify the official 2026 laureates. Instead, it examines recent Nobel-recognized discoveries, their scientific implications, and fields discussed as possible candidates for future recognition.
What is the significance of regulatory T cells in immunology?
Regulatory T cells help control immune responses and maintain peripheral immune tolerance. FOXP3 is a central regulator of their development and function, and research in this area has informed investigations into autoimmune disease, transplantation, and engineered immune-cell therapies.
How are superconducting quantum circuits important for quantum computing?
Superconducting circuits allow researchers to investigate and control quantum phenomena in engineered electrical systems. They form an important hardware platform for developing quantum computers and studying quantum information processing.
Why is microRNA research important?
MicroRNAs regulate gene expression by interacting with target messenger RNAs. They contribute to development and cellular regulation and are being investigated for potential applications in disease diagnosis and treatment.
Can artificial intelligence accelerate scientific discovery?
AI can assist researchers with pattern recognition, predictive modeling, image analysis, and computational research. However, its outputs require validation because models may be difficult to interpret or may generate inaccurate results.
Why can Nobel recognition take decades?
Foundational discoveries often require years of additional experiments, independent validation, mechanistic clarification, and technological development before their full scientific impact becomes evident.
Which fields may receive future Nobel recognition?
The supplied literature discusses areas such as aging research, microRNA therapeutics, engineered immune-cell therapies, AI, quantum technologies, and RNA delivery systems. These are speculative possibilities, not established predictions of future winners.
References
Bluestone, J. (2025). The 2025 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine — a bridge to peripheral immune tolerance. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 135. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci202216
Brassard, G. (2023). Profile of John Clauser, Alain Aspect and Anton Zeilinger: 2022 Nobel laureates in Physics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2304809120
Cleland, A. N., & Girvin, S. M. (2026). Profile of John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret, and John M. Martinis: 2025 Nobel laureates in Physics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 123. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2604018123
Chung-Pei, Lo, S. J., & Tan, B. C.-M. (2025). Good things come in small packages: The discovery of small RNAs in the smallest animal model. Biomedical Journal, 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2025.100832
Furukawa, F. (2024). The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2023 was awarded for discoveries concerning base modifications that enabled the development of effective mRNA vaccines against COVID-19. Trends in Immunotherapy, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.24294/ti.v8.i1.3463
Ghany, M., Lok, A. S. F., Dienstag, J., Feinstone, S., Hoofnagle, J., Liang, T., Seeff, L., Cohen, D. E., Bezerra, J., & Chung, R. (2021). The 2020 Nobel Prize for Medicine or Physiology for the discovery of hepatitis C virus: A triumph of curiosity and persistence. Hepatology, 74, 2813–2823. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31830
Guo, Q.-J., & Wang, H.-H. (2025). Cornerstone for superconducting quantum computing—macroscopic quantum effects in circuits: Comment on 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China. https://doi.org/10.3724/bnsfc-2025-0132
Huang, C.-H., Ku, W.-T., Lin, Y.-C., & Lin, C.-Y. (2026). Regulatory T cells from concept to clinic: The 2025 Nobel Prize and its implications for immune-mediated diseases and cancer. Biomedical Journal, 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2026.100959
Jiang, B., Liu, X., & Lu, F. (2025). Immune modulation, immune homeostasis and diseases: Milestone findings by 2025 Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine. Infectious Diseases & Immunity, 6, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/id9.0000000000000193
Kamarei, Z. B., & Lemke, S. (2025). Analysis for science librarians of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine: Gene regulation and microRNAs. Science & Technology Libraries, 44, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262x.2025.2481833
Krammer, F., & Palese, P. (2024). Profile of Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman: 2023 Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2400423121
Kurtz, A. (2019). Nobel Prize 2019 pays tribute to translational physiology on oxygen sensing. Pflügers Archiv—European Journal of Physiology, 471, 1341–1342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-019-02328-6
Lee, C.-C., Wu, C.-Y., & Yang, H.-Y. (2020). Discoveries of how cells sense oxygen win the 2019 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Biomedical Journal, 43, 434–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2020.05.019
McClelland, J. L. (2025). Profile of John Hopfield and Geoffrey Hinton: 2024 Nobel laureates in Physics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2423094122
Ozcan, A. (2024). Physics and artificial intelligence: Illuminating the future of optics and photonics. Advanced Photonics. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.ap.6.5.050500
Perkins, G., & Naesens, M. (2026). Nobel prize-winning Treg cells in autoimmune kidney diseases and transplantation. Kidney International, 109(4), 624–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2026.01.005
Quévillon Huberdeau, M., & Meister, G. (2024). Nobel Prize for physiology or medicine in 2024 for the discovery of microRNAs: Small RNAs with fundamental roles in development and disease. Pflügers Archiv, 477, 35–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-024-03053-5
Zuber, J., & Kaminski, H. (2025). The 2025 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine honors the immune peacekeepers. Transplant International, 38. https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2025.15767
